Underwear Models Vs Runway Models
Runway models are typically identified to be slim and flat-chested so as not to distract the clothes they wear with their humps. Underwear models, on the other hand, need to have more fats to flaunt them.
Recently, an underwear model made news when she openly criticized Model of the Year Jourdan Dunn for being medically underweight.
Let's hear it for underwear model Katie Green:
"I think it is disgusting that Jourdan won (the award). What kind of message does this send out to young girls, aspiring models and even us normal women?" "At a size 12 and 5ft 10in I am at the bottom of a healthy body mass index, so if I had lost any weight when asked I would have become medically underweight. I want to march Jourdan down to her local restaurant and shovel some food down her throat."
"I think it's thoughtless that the British Fashion Council would crown a stick-thin rake as their Model of the Year. It's almost like they are asking for young girls to have eating disorders."
"Ultimo would never consider hiring a girl of her size. It's a shame other companies cannot follow suit. I'd prefer to not be named model of the year if it means being this unhealthily thin."
You may have a point there, dear Katie. But why bash a fellow model just because you think she doesn't have a body figure similar to yours? If you are happy and confident with you're body, then there's no point lambasting other women especially those who are naturally slim. After all, sexiness is not just about humps and curves, or whether you're a runway or an underwear model, it's also about personal appeal.
Labels: Jourdan Dunn, runway models, Underwear models
Add to del.icio.us | Digg This! | Furl This! | Share on Facebook


































Reader's Comments
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
« Home